{"id":"W2806524686","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2017-0102","title":"Consideration of interlaminar strain–energy continuity in composite plate analysis using improved higher order theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pukyong National University","keywords":"Lagrange multiplier; Flexural strength; Lamination; Strain energy; Composite number; Calculus of variations; Transverse plane; Plate theory; Stress (linguistics); Free energy principle; Structural engineering; Energy functional; Composite laminates; Materials science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Composite material; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Finite element method; Boundary value problem","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001797281,0.0001225721,0.0002726619,0.0001534308,0.00008361537,0.00001603579,0.0001240517,0.0001218219,0.0000565833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008226571,0.0001158581,0.000426296,0.0008070242,0.0000452505,0.00007383663,0.000004185815,0.0001114834,4.444147e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002192278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004730601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004353275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06734084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992869,0.00001625062,0.0003180365,0.0001196822,0.00007608051,0.0001830728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995102,0.00006497289,0.00005044571,0.000185746,0.0001230391,0.00006554889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007128236,0.000006069683,0.00001130012,0.00003381256,0.0007699356,7.187931e-8,0.0002881209,0.9130915,0.08217078,0.002900901,0.000002584497,0.0007178294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002267009,0.00001825044,0.0002324756,0.00002337856,0.0005275051,7.058932e-7,0.00004363321,0.971939,0.02652323,0.0003083929,0.00004485581,0.0001118989],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05027875,0.00004086017,0.9491867,0.0000276355,0.0001948431,0.0001158027,0.0001054381,0.00002482388,0.00002519641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781164,0.000004438381,0.02177374,0.00002373173,0.00002578865,0.000005885915,0.00001379346,0.00001949228,0.00001675764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9496778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006265433305985335,"score_gpt":0.2002652368784988,"score_spread":0.1939998035725135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}