{"id":"W2807123811","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.02","title":"Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Northwestern University","keywords":"China; Misconduct; Boom; Scientific misconduct; Research data; Political science; Public relations; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Library science; Computer science; Medicine; Subject (documents); Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06693082,0.00009892168,0.0002902866,0.001495412,0.001031267,0.009858307,0.001577675,0.001180329,0.0002699699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06315792,0.00008256926,0.0001407954,0.001428801,0.0006254105,0.08229975,0.00009457085,0.02355719,0.000005669476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005108395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002000062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003884515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008660444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935482,0.002335778,0.0008774643,0.0001410443,0.002579933,0.0005175682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925094,0.0008990478,0.0008603823,0.0001443631,0.005260833,0.0003259975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611059,0.0004003637,0.05045576,0.00005345227,0.0001875362,0.0003204293,0.1385623,0.00001348002,0.01398963,0.2692521,0.5002133,0.02609055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001336638,0.0007252249,0.1451913,0.001891733,0.00003585904,0.0009407221,0.08425781,0.000007865558,0.003884832,0.4061865,0.3552033,0.0003381865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8395872,0.002918418,0.0001066,0.08021732,0.002523334,0.0001299491,0.000004698163,0.00001193242,0.07450056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878145,0.001423798,0.002553979,0.0004135448,0.006066776,6.24366e-7,5.585904e-7,0.000011778,0.00171444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1482273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09045961053599434,"score_gpt":0.4077158599293308,"score_spread":0.3172562493933365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}