{"id":"W2807244089","doi":"10.1103/physrevc.98.064602","title":"Proton-nucleus elastic scattering: Comparison between phenomenological and microscopic optical potentials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. C","topic":"Nuclear physics research studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TRIUMF","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Ruhr-Universität Bochum; Technische Universität Darmstadt; TRIUMF","keywords":"Physics; Elastic scattering; Isotopes of tin; Scattering; Nucleon; Proton; Impulse (physics); Nuclear force; Order (exchange); Atomic physics; Nuclear reaction; Nuclear physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007915522,0.0004834185,0.000255265,0.0009535426,0.0005637874,0.00081183,0.0008949844,0.0005015107,0.001722924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001832642,0.0001669612,0.0004392882,0.0007557279,0.001088815,0.001173715,0.0007402488,0.0003863939,0.0001656008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006271378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000644397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001056809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008166567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996872,0.0001217944,0.00001023649,0.00002085032,0.0001191544,0.00004073743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993357,0.0003516873,0.0000673983,0.0001077002,0.00009656526,0.00004088736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002086955,0.0001422409,0.003489375,0.0002888938,0.00005798321,0.0003195944,0.0001365489,0.5531627,0.01178821,0.4130858,0.0004299637,0.01688998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002777279,0.00005695254,0.001461629,0.00002230661,0.00001591988,0.0001501244,0.00009926061,0.9200117,0.005683274,0.07150114,0.000941992,0.0000279595],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7304024,0.001333123,0.2054303,0.0005358799,0.00009958122,0.0001051284,0.0002858961,0.0001779953,0.06162979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905269,0.000241019,0.007776128,0.00003146472,0.00001649225,0.00003067982,0.0001022165,0.00004404756,0.001231086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001722924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005763769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04472940015452456,"score_gpt":0.393871912141124,"score_spread":0.3491425119865995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}