{"id":"W2807388818","doi":"10.1080/17538947.2018.1480670","title":"Assessing relevance of tweets for risk communication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Digital Earth","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Southern Mississippi; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Relevance (law); Event (particle physics); Social media; Flooding (psychology); Flood myth; Situation awareness; Computer science; Data science; Emergency management; Reliability (semiconductor); Quality (philosophy); Geography; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009232341,0.0005932717,0.0004486211,0.00610653,0.0008192557,0.002425064,0.0005676611,0.0008217127,0.001263774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1010115,0.0002553714,0.0005531015,0.004285326,0.0005755531,0.002998236,0.001409017,0.0008701303,0.0005233844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008522751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009986812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002688019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002887783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920062,0.003642247,0.001058702,0.0005779727,0.00240136,0.0003135354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8991002,0.07476547,0.01009498,0.002994662,0.01229215,0.000752518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002072112,0.0003718816,0.749684,0.001900535,0.0004643239,0.000765375,0.01063872,0.01226124,0.01114757,0.002418322,0.004825008,0.2034508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008260795,0.001190213,0.7748534,0.0006348154,0.0007910686,0.0007967406,0.02225114,0.1490843,0.02011944,0.01020769,0.01975319,0.0002353171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620928,0.001088236,0.02109405,0.001409718,0.0002053165,0.0009759688,0.003839069,0.0002745474,0.009020423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870727,0.0002852147,0.01034147,0.0000803699,0.00009448878,0.0002504421,0.001362167,0.00002747413,0.0004856234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009232341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04882586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04241974618338576,"score_gpt":0.3954484724220798,"score_spread":0.353028726238694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}