{"id":"W2808231890","doi":"","title":"Review of Riccardo Saccenti’s Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Middle Ages; Ideology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Period (music); Law; Transition (genetics); Canon law; Classics; Epistemology; History; Humanities; Political science; Politics; Theology; Aesthetics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003531255,0.0002025621,0.0005261351,0.0000512756,0.0001544479,0.00001972219,0.0003707528,0.00007435277,0.001801559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001763802,0.000176519,0.0001799832,0.0001367847,0.0008432198,0.0001685513,0.0001586566,0.0002456454,0.00003819585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000461658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007118121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004235046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00703751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981606,0.0003568025,0.0004622717,0.0003137938,0.0003032386,0.0004033163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986721,0.0003379932,0.000194283,0.0003313921,0.0003395874,0.0001246884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008850584,0.001634152,0.005333786,0.009303602,0.0007818814,0.00006701086,0.008788629,0.000002002424,0.0004787463,0.9129331,0.05401547,0.005776614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00265783,0.0009781418,0.0190366,0.01382447,0.0006814937,0.00001182018,0.0006062094,0.0006703778,0.001113823,0.03001587,0.9291148,0.001288515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.192407,0.0410029,0.000005671022,0.004671443,0.001698023,0.001249889,0.001172038,0.0001336433,0.7576593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921166,0.004558999,0.00003113924,0.001091706,0.0003411075,0.00000115609,0.00007323372,0.0000169292,0.001769127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04838886735422862,"score_gpt":0.2649943409845381,"score_spread":0.2166054736303094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}