{"id":"W2808231890","doi":"","title":"Review of Riccardo Saccenti’s Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Middle Ages; Ideology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Period (music); Law; Transition (genetics); Canon law; Classics; Epistemology; History; Humanities; Political science; Politics; Theology; Aesthetics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925894,0.0005611051,0.000696226,0.005820037,0.001229993,0.002698398,0.0007832611,0.001554728,0.00483747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004716661,0.0004074224,0.00024242,0.009897796,0.003539568,0.004025585,0.001686038,0.002684089,0.001761122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00483092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991811,0.000219487,0.00005982843,0.000101008,0.000368789,0.00006987018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968935,0.002048956,0.0002064116,0.00008556613,0.0005835192,0.0001819571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002617372,0.00002641306,0.0005455064,0.003575738,0.00002474307,0.00009391243,0.001518159,0.0002155211,0.0001480489,0.0654387,0.7222614,0.2061257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001104589,0.000004178499,0.0007853584,0.001579625,0.000003211224,0.00006515548,0.0002445775,0.00001408289,0.00002717686,0.002037643,0.9952324,0.000005587527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002358265,0.9771101,0.0001268489,0.01246669,0.002270808,0.000002761481,0.00003523837,0.000007215865,0.0077444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004687164,0.9749486,0.0002066629,0.009237508,0.005929065,0.000009814219,0.00009274321,0.00001972016,0.00486866],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03030998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04838886735422862,"score_gpt":0.2649943409845381,"score_spread":0.2166054736303094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}