{"id":"W2808264558","doi":"10.1017/jog.2018.48","title":"Ice discharge error estimates using different cross-sectional area approaches: a case study for the Canadian High Arctic, 2016/17","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Glaciology","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Arctic Science Committee; European Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Ice field; Glacier; Geology; Arctic; Glacier morphology; Groenlandia; Thinning; The arctic; Surge; Physical geography; Geodesy; Geomorphology; Climatology; Arctic ice pack; Ice sheet; Geography; Oceanography; Antarctic sea ice","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827446,0.0007066756,0.0004263371,0.002365689,0.0008680947,0.001635067,0.001052447,0.0005055869,0.0005955495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01052449,0.0002019901,0.0006471133,0.003649985,0.0007294432,0.0005831239,0.001015455,0.0003725031,0.0001297284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005797558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8029279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7792286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983376,0.0002425411,0.0001334183,0.000352569,0.0007390534,0.0001947299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993988,0.002019616,0.0006412593,0.0003867807,0.002839264,0.0001249604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003104142,0.00009411341,0.7323958,0.0001906219,0.0004481959,0.0006679951,0.001083596,0.1996399,0.002221495,0.00166397,0.001238737,0.06004512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105124,0.0001166007,0.6657363,0.0001209394,0.0001706996,0.0004260576,0.001841501,0.3192941,0.006981115,0.0008475598,0.004317494,0.0001165388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841674,0.0004624752,0.01183478,0.0001126797,0.00001224883,0.00004561333,0.001596843,0.0001826907,0.001585363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980994,0.0002349557,0.01589244,0.0000247296,0.000007340745,0.00002065811,0.001939785,0.00005214065,0.0008339123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1970721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3964654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1504635197589679,"score_gpt":0.314216782219351,"score_spread":0.1637532624603831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}