{"id":"W2808274252","doi":"10.1017/s0266462318000351","title":"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"","keywords":"Health technology; Transparency (behavior); Environmental impact assessment; Sustainability; Agency (philosophy); Impact assessment; Grey literature; Management science; Conceptual framework; Technology assessment; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Health care; Computer science; Environmental planning; MEDLINE; Business; Engineering; Political science; Environmental science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189613,0.0006741494,0.003459463,0.001456657,0.0001624017,0.00002922907,0.002156058,0.0006089768,0.001065982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009438019,0.0005661478,0.000837708,0.0009838673,0.0007144047,0.0003543668,0.001118732,0.001803821,0.00003156435],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01267233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002390241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001128584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004809371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921675,0.0005938305,0.004322506,0.0006117502,0.001560566,0.0007438762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917408,0.0001159943,0.007274086,0.0005919126,0.00005897686,0.0002182697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006839251,0.0006797647,0.02747066,0.01742352,0.0004490186,0.00008624791,0.0001429457,0.00001728239,0.000002715489,0.00008094756,0.0008446946,0.9527954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001901849,0.004224368,0.00925527,0.771933,0.0003482672,0.001172511,0.002216422,0.0000123726,0.000005519954,0.0004610589,0.2072758,0.001193639],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007197969,0.9931557,0.0001552444,0.002698401,0.0008117454,0.002021162,0.0001561064,0.00003747757,0.0002444343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009327381,0.9840357,0.00584194,0.000404255,0.00009583059,0.000100294,0.0001108348,0.00006976093,0.00001397691],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03672303503942335,"score_gpt":0.486660561620368,"score_spread":0.4499375265809447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}