{"id":"W2808274252","doi":"10.1017/s0266462318000351","title":"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"","keywords":"Health technology; Transparency (behavior); Environmental impact assessment; Sustainability; Agency (philosophy); Impact assessment; Grey literature; Management science; Conceptual framework; Technology assessment; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Health care; Computer science; Environmental planning; MEDLINE; Business; Engineering; Political science; Environmental science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245129,0.001871717,0.004152795,0.02993864,0.001811859,0.007607111,0.002398019,0.005353775,0.005306391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123017,0.001361273,0.004729334,0.02845548,0.00241101,0.007786642,0.003086341,0.00312145,0.001214277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01014273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03377929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009089069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01629279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9702098,0.009945991,0.009051611,0.001648212,0.008518009,0.0006263308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413742,0.1178708,0.01451299,0.002304338,0.02306018,0.0008775064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009745932,0.00005073575,0.0009355912,0.7150421,0.001278649,0.0003513061,0.0008238296,0.0005813768,0.0005012467,0.007504975,0.02861963,0.2442132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137562,0.00004809077,0.0008467229,0.9034676,0.001538814,0.0002199232,0.0003831983,0.0001175124,0.0001772916,0.002140749,0.09102222,0.00002410992],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003162979,0.991214,0.0009055793,0.003673134,0.0009924354,0.0005287572,0.0002764651,0.00001544443,0.002078012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004448251,0.9897966,0.002008479,0.001827026,0.0005065784,0.0007544656,0.0002752467,0.00001053924,0.0003728569],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03245129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1716208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03672303503942335,"score_gpt":0.486660561620368,"score_spread":0.4499375265809447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}