{"id":"W2808555260","doi":"10.1103/physreva.100.030303","title":"Uncertain fate of fair sampling in quantum annealing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. A/Physical review, A","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"QLT (Canada)","funders":"Office of the Director of National Intelligence; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Quantum annealing; Quantum; Transverse plane; Statistical physics; Sampling (signal processing); Importance sampling; Physics; Degeneracy (biology); Quantum Monte Carlo; Monte Carlo method; Quantum mechanics; Computer science; Mathematics; Quantum computer; Statistics; Optics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701194,0.0002438224,0.0007098824,0.0003930136,0.001203231,0.001510387,0.001130423,0.0009729053,0.002579157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02042528,0.0003713054,0.0004255871,0.0003450921,0.003416366,0.003265485,0.001243323,0.00126859,0.0002638398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00148291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001228274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009884698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985015,0.0007185912,0.00005944995,0.0002169431,0.0003051212,0.0001984175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901569,0.006566656,0.0004680781,0.001875607,0.0006253467,0.0003073765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005301161,0.0001219693,0.003186599,0.0001520338,0.00006353202,0.0001802779,0.0004066141,0.2109974,0.01652101,0.7330577,0.001739537,0.0330431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004031795,0.00009754148,0.0004858407,0.00001488599,0.00001481755,0.00004357281,0.00005910398,0.7106806,0.01130892,0.2762017,0.001028855,0.00002388408],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.544067,0.0009874481,0.4417503,0.002202707,0.0001598809,0.0001343791,0.00008981189,0.0006553206,0.009953181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803669,0.0001014175,0.01815439,0.0001127255,0.00002201079,0.00005578242,0.00002072771,0.00004764544,0.001118447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004701194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02486259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02222092331368797,"score_gpt":0.3580572961516306,"score_spread":0.3358363728379427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}