{"id":"W2808557434","doi":"10.1142/s0219622018500384","title":"Interactive Visualization for Group Decision Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Visualization; Usability; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Stakeholder; Decision quality; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Group decision-making; Human–computer interaction; Knowledge management; Decision support system; Data science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Team effectiveness","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005424803,0.0002620721,0.000728961,0.01200654,0.0003214834,0.001124881,0.002868074,0.0002951837,0.0007019112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02324911,0.0001968236,0.0006975592,0.004473116,0.0001830775,0.003840582,0.0005447366,0.0002830609,0.0002790072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000295274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003098453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003611065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991734,0.000102407,0.003997916,0.0003556224,0.003510582,0.0002994489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777262,0.00470468,0.004339841,0.0006301323,0.01249846,0.0001006774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001516723,0.00006971354,0.005882266,0.000001626976,0.0005251445,0.00001033351,0.0006675896,0.001708753,0.0001523824,0.05959598,0.01281601,0.9170535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002400278,0.0007092815,0.0124209,0.0004252338,0.0001874373,0.0004045658,0.003224535,0.1231751,0.0005057337,0.6699235,0.1862352,0.0003882463],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07990658,0.0001125836,0.9142213,0.0003090985,0.004202728,0.0002460637,0.00003274989,0.00006156381,0.0009072666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699948,0.000008591646,0.1290175,0.0004599533,0.0004550451,0.00001038275,0.000006185661,0.00001256495,0.00003503923],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04104666265629382,"score_gpt":0.4362768066141502,"score_spread":0.3952301439578564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}