{"id":"W2808604553","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.040","title":"Optimal scheduling of a microgrid in a volatile electricity market environment: Portfolio optimization approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Smart Grid Energy Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microgrid; Electricity; Electricity market; Computer science; Renewable energy; Photovoltaic system; Scheduling (production processes); Grid; Demand response; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000147498,0.0001966019,0.0002278345,0.0002557883,0.00003070648,0.00001416929,0.0001834548,0.0001018302,0.0002705945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003562939,0.0002268702,0.00004079177,0.0004173079,0.00005580627,0.00006937867,0.00007661289,0.00008954597,0.00000502281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001028166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006322155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000591323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988704,0.00001476915,0.0003324846,0.0002708431,0.0001754101,0.0003361296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00001731395,0.00005864669,0.0002927387,0.0000115465,0.000053125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002956646,0.00007293284,0.000114671,0.00002152398,0.0000467954,0.00000129265,0.00004481109,0.9923803,0.003392864,0.001626886,0.0005250872,0.001743299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004104238,0.00002894764,0.0003381172,0.000007006598,0.00001579318,0.00000161557,0.00002640839,0.9755084,0.01977336,0.00003022513,0.003643363,0.000216325],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1181667,0.0001840746,0.7905035,0.000003688894,0.0001059107,0.0001210432,0.000002480975,0.0001593481,0.09075321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736315,0.0001918537,0.1257398,0.00002458244,0.0001531062,0.00008682044,0.00003719161,0.00005043465,0.00008462367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7554648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9251497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004577644194704534,"score_gpt":0.1641074993147718,"score_spread":0.1595298551200672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}