{"id":"W2808646910","doi":"10.1515/jmbm-2013-0001","title":"A comparison of Newtonian and non-Newtonian models for pulsatile blood flow simulations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials","topic":"Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Pulsatile flow; Non-Newtonian fluid; Newtonian fluid; Blood flow; Shear stress; Generalized Newtonian fluid; Mechanics; Blood viscosity; Power law; Stenosis; Shear rate; Rheology; Mathematics; Materials science; Medicine; Cardiology; Physics; Thermodynamics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058061,0.0004367254,0.0005877421,0.0007532085,0.000360834,0.0007931635,0.001143318,0.0008377997,0.001194545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004757954,0.0002727344,0.0004300837,0.0005887898,0.0005170243,0.0008754248,0.0003788549,0.0004972412,0.0002072541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007443673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00967594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00599484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995818,0.0001818322,0.00002771495,0.00002899426,0.000141936,0.00003772747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966393,0.002274737,0.0002333967,0.0002549056,0.0004830431,0.0001146288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332874,0.0001664598,0.002097797,0.00005617318,0.00002831142,0.00006548503,0.0001142235,0.9757002,0.004367079,0.00506944,0.0003679827,0.0118335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006505595,0.00002723769,0.0002460137,0.000003549527,0.000003851501,0.000006300215,0.00001001917,0.9985431,0.0005769192,0.000345617,0.0002263414,0.000004596282],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182559,0.0008777945,0.2607095,0.0007361764,0.0001976588,0.0002541502,0.0002763588,0.0008229925,0.01786945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601614,0.0004845672,0.03647212,0.00008618065,0.000033436,0.0001455976,0.0001152669,0.00009874058,0.002402668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00967594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01923925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03743233614413009,"score_gpt":0.3408094627021656,"score_spread":0.3033771265580354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}