{"id":"W2808771292","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.010","title":"Production quality and human factors engineering: A systematic review and theoretical framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence; Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Workload; Quality by Design; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Quality management; Empirical research; Product (mathematics); Human factors and ergonomics; Conceptual framework; Production (economics); Operations management; Computer science; Poison control; Medicine; Management system; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01885514,0.002519242,0.01096831,0.02835739,0.001197404,0.006541989,0.002540122,0.004938257,0.004241031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0497936,0.001744889,0.008397299,0.02431659,0.002287926,0.005698216,0.003497152,0.002458069,0.0003448731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00707538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02880816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01363112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05118903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9833626,0.005784171,0.006153869,0.001307701,0.002799619,0.0005920777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952945,0.03569215,0.007502822,0.0006022555,0.002820764,0.0004369685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001042944,0.0000509799,0.000941617,0.9389328,0.007457087,0.0001474305,0.0005961154,0.0001337374,0.0001316708,0.001066607,0.001276104,0.04916151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001902406,0.0001515134,0.003786144,0.9191571,0.05220826,0.0004562593,0.0009152217,0.0001092318,0.0001236242,0.000870606,0.02197551,0.00005617472],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003163436,0.9989993,0.0001176985,0.0002072155,0.00005175547,0.0001246677,0.00007564112,0.000002162943,0.0001051891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007259145,0.9907326,0.001011432,0.0005178744,0.00006030745,0.0002991148,0.00005742938,0.000002413529,0.0000597277],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02835739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09971672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1436659763495821,"score_gpt":0.5001492143303935,"score_spread":0.3564832379808114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}