{"id":"W2809646666","doi":"10.1017/s1041610218000923","title":"Validity of a novel computerized screening test system for mild cognitive impairment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Psychogeriatrics","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Predictive validity; Predictive value; Cognitive impairment; Receiver operating characteristic; Gold standard (test); Validity; Test (biology); Medicine; Concurrent validity; Positive predicative value; Cognition; Psychology; Internal medicine; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005633104,0.0001488354,0.0002572151,0.0002754469,0.00007570216,0.00003727955,0.0001754148,0.00006724898,0.0001312135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002572096,0.0001366968,0.0001930456,0.0002559951,0.0001093411,0.00008364081,0.00007459699,0.00009118308,0.00002281408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008457935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008608397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001595036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001694275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998343,0.00002552118,0.00042308,0.0003337068,0.0006235989,0.0002510744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974459,0.0004065389,0.0002036837,0.0001344307,0.001684271,0.0001251765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01545962,0.009950782,0.8642863,0.001367029,0.001909231,0.00004109204,0.0006779989,0.00000331387,0.06831806,0.001682645,0.01446302,0.02184087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04493906,0.008594244,0.8666418,0.001453925,0.000512719,0.000179336,0.0008867389,0.02188911,0.04572305,0.0001093525,0.008571446,0.0004991849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6544621,0.00001620411,0.3368685,0.0005415577,0.001124617,0.001226755,0.0007030338,0.00006268844,0.004994582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801915,0.000009799825,0.01776802,0.0002132412,0.0010869,0.0001007995,0.000206448,0.00002240644,0.0004009255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3257294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5574335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05958312704710447,"score_gpt":0.381707860241871,"score_spread":0.3221247331947665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}