{"id":"W2810178509","doi":"10.1609/icaps.v28i1.13908","title":"Finite LTL Synthesis as Planning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Linear temporal logic; Leverage (statistics); Automaton; Program synthesis; Finite-state machine; Theoretical computer science; Bottleneck; Transformation (genetics); Exploit; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257698,0.0001395617,0.0001413328,0.0001672236,0.0002145594,0.0003063086,0.00121644,0.00007939341,0.00001599191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001680588,0.000109005,0.00003892874,0.0002222277,0.0001216753,0.0004468579,0.0002770967,0.0001920362,0.00001754226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003003405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005813609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009582071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.070921e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988213,0.00001467382,0.0002731866,0.0003045761,0.000408737,0.0001775768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988441,0.0001976967,0.0003202581,0.0001319037,0.0004531322,0.00005283851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485125,0.00006851397,0.01528495,0.00008450972,0.0001343071,0.000003218286,0.005834118,0.001692915,0.09485862,0.874532,0.0004034273,0.006954958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001029634,0.00007381557,0.003831462,0.000854181,0.000007088396,0.00002254021,0.000336054,0.8563024,0.1335532,0.004687189,0.00009780248,0.0001312702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.937079,0.00003427745,0.01408389,0.001340551,0.0007558843,0.000113554,0.00000367287,0.0005380907,0.0460511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8807368,0.000005330282,0.1188926,0.0001892491,0.00007260361,0.00001058425,5.254183e-7,0.000007396899,0.00008488901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4445093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06458275588763768,"score_gpt":0.3362396133394855,"score_spread":0.2716568574518479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}