{"id":"W2810292709","doi":"10.21603/2308-4057-2017-2-162-169","title":"USE OF THE METHOD OF ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE FOR DETERMINATION OF ABSORBED DOSES OF IONIZING RADIATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEAT AND FISH RAW MATERIALS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foods and raw materials","topic":"Radiation Effects and Dosimetry","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ionizing radiation; Absorbed dose; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Electron paramagnetic resonance; Chemistry; Food science; Radiation dose; Radiochemistry; Dosimetry; Irradiation; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Biology; Fishery; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192737,0.001016487,0.0006201135,0.001773371,0.0003247732,0.0005271479,0.0008530664,0.0007710052,0.002317127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001843243,0.0003663707,0.0004979636,0.001198898,0.0004166956,0.0007827108,0.0005848781,0.001033559,0.00132645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003175578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004977603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000524263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001034112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970271,0.0006399477,0.0001718006,0.0007966975,0.001281628,0.000082932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984006,0.0003869971,0.0002809525,0.000219875,0.0006661753,0.00004537627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001811121,0.0001038865,0.007360758,0.001357212,0.0001508335,0.0002266511,0.0001725609,0.0003892404,0.8997899,0.0008022775,0.001421028,0.08804464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002543417,0.001032316,0.03705391,0.0002004701,0.0002442339,0.003019216,0.0002295201,0.004089919,0.9079364,0.001420179,0.04463159,0.0001166847],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.155625,0.03989372,0.7865247,0.0007834589,0.0009109424,0.0005138179,0.001728031,0.001289957,0.01273038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3553547,0.02464987,0.6005065,0.0004428845,0.0002516769,0.0007355099,0.001935184,0.0002948895,0.0158288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002317127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01019305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02627093997012632,"score_gpt":0.2745941046525675,"score_spread":0.2483231646824412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}