{"id":"W2810761248","doi":"10.3758/s13428-018-1073-0","title":"Are mind wandering rates an artifact of the probe-caught method? Using self-caught mind wandering in the classroom to test, and reject, this possibility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Artifact (error); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Range (aeronautics); Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01480149,0.0002735202,0.0003863124,0.0003470241,0.0008651579,0.0003098235,0.0008127299,0.0001612501,0.0001186653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00493428,0.0001722563,0.0001095436,0.001606731,0.000466239,0.0003430876,0.0005157146,0.0008738102,0.000006285245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001556017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001961993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005732747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899744,0.006671868,0.0005793296,0.0009967715,0.0009596618,0.0008179155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959124,0.002343671,0.0002329436,0.001063857,0.0002447073,0.0002023632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000737636,0.0004427626,0.03159385,0.00005549165,0.000003836821,0.0000199262,0.004545154,0.000007786653,0.9285956,0.00001122499,0.00001604708,0.03463455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003575399,0.0003312461,0.1216126,0.000173127,0.00003472956,0.000080461,0.002151532,0.003624196,0.8705248,0.0003522357,0.0005254714,0.0002320275],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922175,0.00004868742,0.005514436,0.0004763666,0.000128774,0.001395611,0.00001597925,0.00002199334,0.0001806986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8619798,0.000006719019,0.1373593,0.00004782282,0.0001061968,0.0001050963,6.006262e-7,0.00003470287,0.0003598283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1318448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7024408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4103673811000614,"score_gpt":0.5647695724099545,"score_spread":0.1544021913098931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}