{"id":"W2810761248","doi":"10.3758/s13428-018-1073-0","title":"Are mind wandering rates an artifact of the probe-caught method? Using self-caught mind wandering in the classroom to test, and reject, this possibility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Artifact (error); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Range (aeronautics); Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03389131,0.0007091127,0.0007680521,0.001004009,0.0008162347,0.002249961,0.001919261,0.001475109,0.002657223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2544973,0.0006567592,0.0008852294,0.0006383099,0.002432325,0.002711236,0.002332194,0.002322177,0.0005971987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004944359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008874591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001441982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001428892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712319,0.014776,0.002233658,0.004563055,0.006664486,0.0005308957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7921899,0.1356023,0.02796667,0.03531767,0.007729289,0.001194117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005423393,0.003080111,0.6573725,0.001797867,0.002598226,0.0007323403,0.02414268,0.001774773,0.03794556,0.02704231,0.004228841,0.2338614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006499716,0.007585106,0.8838405,0.0007216381,0.002247992,0.002795639,0.00431229,0.01959816,0.03837525,0.02688335,0.01271955,0.0002706161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7779511,0.001109593,0.1983517,0.001619541,0.0008866733,0.001231989,0.0004041541,0.0006189074,0.01782634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541953,0.0002142707,0.04101698,0.000903263,0.0001687603,0.001166094,0.0001920943,0.0002174748,0.001925615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1792365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4103673811000614,"score_gpt":0.5647695724099545,"score_spread":0.1544021913098931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}