{"id":"W2810795761","doi":"10.1163/22244662-06303004","title":"Integrating animal welfare into wildlife policy: a comparative analysis of coyote management programs in California, United States and Ontario, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Wildlife; Urban sprawl; Wildlife management; Animal welfare; Human–wildlife conflict; Population; Geography; Welfare; Wildlife conservation; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Land use; Ecology; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002336004,0.0002006939,0.0003586135,0.001846975,0.005911159,0.00256001,0.001661226,0.0007652037,0.001909214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150378,0.0003001115,0.00033822,0.004485222,0.002455804,0.0007859928,0.001446364,0.0008275645,0.00008652984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1190248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1037167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964023,0.0007130978,0.0001211157,0.0002419513,0.001033578,0.001487942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906328,0.001455194,0.001183704,0.000199831,0.004031677,0.002496791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004032147,0.0004508202,0.9014554,0.0002848288,0.0001820042,0.0006131158,0.04209646,0.0009400144,0.0007140411,0.005456174,0.006504442,0.0408995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002176856,0.0001023539,0.9354103,0.0001196061,0.00004574368,0.00004695336,0.05431712,0.0003471159,0.00008036125,0.00009393695,0.009395057,0.0000197353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869997,0.001052266,0.0001056332,0.001250596,0.00001808661,0.0001159751,0.0002932269,0.00000555731,0.01015894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960045,0.0009268384,0.0001655775,0.0002514232,0.000005356527,0.00004153564,0.000241574,0.000004345976,0.002358859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1190248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8635896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01900272105269765,"score_gpt":0.3188732890241271,"score_spread":0.2998705679714295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}