{"id":"W2810879288","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.42116","title":"Using Logic Models and the Action Model/Change Model Schema in Planning the Learning Community Program: A Comparative Case Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Logic model; Computer science; Strengths and weaknesses; Logic program; Management science; Action (physics); Theory of change; Artificial intelligence; Process management; Knowledge management; Data science; Machine learning; Psychology; Logic programming; Sociology; Engineering; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":2,"stratum":"venue_new","weight":2684.24666666667,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"low","reason":"Comparative case study assessing the relative strengths of logic models versus the action model/change model schema as planning and evaluation tools; the object is evaluation methodology, which sits on the boundary between applied evaluation practice and research methods."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"This comparative case study evaluates program-evaluation models and their properties as methodological tools."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Compares logic models for planning a learning-community program; program evaluation methods, not evaluation of research."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02784475,0.0005846195,0.0004261049,0.002050006,0.004964511,0.003550044,0.002405425,0.002091751,0.004727187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03142245,0.0004282472,0.0005792009,0.003181233,0.004058219,0.004913773,0.003516927,0.002953947,0.0003068074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01424043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009459924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03084544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05839643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9763229,0.02083988,0.0004352389,0.0003862258,0.001305637,0.0007099534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619389,0.03227206,0.001213134,0.001538915,0.002309814,0.0007271689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00153968,0.0160678,0.06162425,0.001911658,0.0001258595,0.01029944,0.253558,0.06347058,0.002899843,0.2291434,0.008288638,0.3510709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146017,0.008113258,0.03467581,0.002624108,0.0003289628,0.00270523,0.5698121,0.1917416,0.01280642,0.06954271,0.1061618,0.0003419201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8822368,0.0003487477,0.04394875,0.003445611,0.00003846385,0.00274883,0.0002198245,0.00009743747,0.06691554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510813,0.0003303023,0.04536816,0.0001655129,0.000005402313,0.001103871,0.00007774366,0.00002760265,0.001840088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03084544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9477306850220157,"score_gpt":0.6849694826574051,"score_spread":0.2627612023646106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}