{"id":"W2811250613","doi":"10.1017/s004740451800057x","title":"Deconstructing variation in pragmatic function: A transdisciplinary case study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language in Society","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Storyboard; Context (archaeology); Circumscription; Deconstruction (building); Linguistics; Function (biology); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; History; Philosophy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001410101,0.00006297965,0.0001112439,0.00003967976,0.0002623743,0.00002979346,0.00007396785,0.00009455754,0.0005060178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000304303,0.00006499141,0.00004011355,0.0004091548,0.0001148062,0.00008969882,0.00002155957,0.0001358704,0.00001448346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001208068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001115608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009927572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06412216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989706,0.000279475,0.0002313809,0.0001846947,0.0001365849,0.0001973052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995647,0.0001735547,0.00006599348,0.0001094614,0.00004897208,0.00003730091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006036793,0.0001289344,0.02700783,0.000005671939,0.000009669358,0.0003647358,0.9697279,0.000004415546,0.00005771019,0.00140569,0.00003484593,0.001246532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008709,0.00007585472,0.02422189,0.00001219482,0.00001672733,0.00007283194,0.97272,0.0006704216,0.000002307407,0.0009103655,0.0001846113,0.0001041309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909092,0.00002373017,0.0009185228,0.0002220402,0.0005947787,0.0003384572,0.000001553076,0.00004823547,0.006943438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969394,0.000001582601,0.002125294,0.0002042442,0.0005317655,0.0000263427,0.00000164804,0.000005838311,0.0001639292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05419458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02018512949415584,"score_gpt":0.3496190448814798,"score_spread":0.329433915387324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}