{"id":"W2811505963","doi":"10.1111/rec.12855","title":"Evaluating outcomes of restoration ecology projects on limited budgets: assessment of variation in sampling intensity and sampling frequency for four habitat types","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Quadrat; Species richness; Ecology; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Species diversity; Restoration ecology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03148728,0.0006038374,0.0006152329,0.001715332,0.0006937076,0.0008911997,0.001170141,0.0005390903,0.000501063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06428625,0.0003412622,0.0005095398,0.001317103,0.00107726,0.001063768,0.002221059,0.0005485938,0.0001395356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001376168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001080435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003725746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01372076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816057,0.009850735,0.001467711,0.002084544,0.004037774,0.0009535398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221858,0.03188847,0.02982529,0.005299269,0.008087482,0.00271369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001330341,0.0008025949,0.9369132,0.00006825977,0.000329761,0.00009474076,0.001277437,0.00877993,0.007874929,0.0001216309,0.0002018834,0.04220537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001532255,0.001245351,0.9903356,0.00001013069,0.00004405967,0.00003832072,0.0003304217,0.006237229,0.00141405,0.00007619758,0.0002373024,0.0000159956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973817,0.0000212511,0.002034363,0.00001395736,0.000002474749,0.00009065496,0.00009068679,0.00001403114,0.0003507873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948679,0.0000255173,0.004145946,0.00001418086,0.000006224437,0.0003129817,0.000324177,0.00001277291,0.000290299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03148728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1665226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09339759204573823,"score_gpt":0.376377676930458,"score_spread":0.2829800848847198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}