{"id":"W2824491965","doi":"10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.89-112","title":"ASPEK HUKUM CLASS ACTION DAN CITIZEN LAW SUIT SERTA PERKEMBANGANNYA DI INDONESIA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Class action; Law; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Political science; Jurisdiction; Action (physics); Assertion; Class (philosophy); State (computer science)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008227469,0.0003512292,0.0004322245,0.0001292789,0.002613973,0.0002419785,0.0004508164,0.0002888713,0.00006388042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004105462,0.000299406,0.0002577022,0.0003827446,0.0007798865,0.0009682859,0.00009096006,0.0005457906,0.00007241061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003556955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000805437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002982085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967567,0.0004165638,0.0004069605,0.0003815687,0.0008530384,0.001185195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986904,0.0001015672,0.0001993168,0.0003058131,0.0001505019,0.0005523768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010083,0.0003253898,0.5478129,0.00006123777,0.0002196684,0.00004746006,0.04158716,0.000006516831,0.00282885,0.3982889,0.004636175,0.00408487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005314026,0.00008380356,0.4844556,0.00004431909,0.00008467097,0.00005189169,0.01063041,0.00001303028,0.0005900486,0.0001999321,0.5027936,0.000521263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907887,0.000648826,0.0000105184,0.00387939,0.002061646,0.0003029551,0.000007135731,0.0001835603,0.1021172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849858,0.00009179297,0.00003147818,0.0007385529,0.004133061,0.00002739383,0.00002015043,0.00004775383,0.009924063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4981574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03414312828693187,"score_gpt":0.3029877726609967,"score_spread":0.2688446443740648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}