{"id":"W2826165912","doi":"10.1177/0961000618785408","title":"Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Information science; Minor (academic); Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08090798,0.0005883129,0.001150696,0.01932536,0.005732508,0.008239628,0.003581068,0.002729958,0.003498737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4603237,0.0007773056,0.001172816,0.01545786,0.003520418,0.00666974,0.005204957,0.002211327,0.003074602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004499732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009838664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00260898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003757473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8167534,0.07805809,0.0348392,0.01009213,0.05644503,0.003812241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3110069,0.3047059,0.198641,0.0586688,0.1155769,0.01140062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009335799,0.0002928677,0.2734509,0.004106616,0.0004520408,0.003524309,0.108776,0.0006309653,0.007730742,0.003365384,0.02016076,0.5765759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126588,0.001930424,0.4928748,0.00467247,0.000464805,0.01831966,0.1051279,0.003137844,0.01516657,0.005800846,0.3515515,0.0008266162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9002125,0.03259996,0.01325411,0.01934928,0.002338713,0.001114522,0.0006606492,0.001203301,0.02926717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507341,0.01097468,0.01794554,0.002042451,0.001368717,0.0003811025,0.0006419398,0.0003852632,0.01552614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.99727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4278874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03919387877003243,"score_gpt":0.3343058517107731,"score_spread":0.2951119729407407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}