{"id":"W2832492673","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhy009","title":"An Epistemic Argument for Research-Practice Integration in Medicine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Sociology; Transformation (genetics); Health care; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05933395,0.000380063,0.001519069,0.001113545,0.0004365151,0.00001093462,0.000619946,0.0006410149,0.00004652415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04645676,0.0002023017,0.0001280407,0.0007722862,0.02221415,0.0002700265,0.0001210405,0.003482137,7.680867e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009809948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004075863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005350125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000181051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931229,0.0008704517,0.002378243,0.0004748613,0.00254102,0.0006125203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609239,0.03066922,0.001110034,0.0007122176,0.005950927,0.0006336602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01894478,0.0004462445,0.0003793504,0.002152537,0.0002848035,0.00002345162,0.01247837,0.000001169712,0.007653757,0.9385972,0.004979839,0.01405847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01449975,0.06509876,0.0001274353,0.0113399,0.0005712786,0.0003961599,0.01081671,0.0004344975,0.000614484,0.8906624,0.005281724,0.0001568626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105561,0.01335665,0.002519579,0.966853,0.0006549526,0.00174737,0.00002628653,0.00001105483,0.004275009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953392,0.02336779,0.002146172,0.01239026,0.008538743,0.00002966961,0.00002854411,0.00005289265,0.00005388142],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6201752658057844,"score_gpt":0.6017771940372039,"score_spread":0.01839807176858055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}