{"id":"W2837004038","doi":"10.1101/364182","title":"Predation risk and resource abundance mediate foraging behaviour and intraspecific resource partitioning among consumers in dominance hierarchies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Dominance (genetics); Biology; Ecology; Intraspecific competition; Population; Predator; Abundance (ecology); Trade-off; Optimal foraging theory; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002847131,0.0001740643,0.0002361822,0.0002489608,0.0003902105,0.0004737882,0.0001510082,0.0001660789,0.001824501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000704409,0.000172287,0.0001335409,0.0001168881,0.0003405397,0.0002173077,0.0004943374,0.0002420029,0.0001291954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002133179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003014124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008264134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01623205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999922,0.00001694331,0.000005636591,0.00001923832,0.00001344389,0.00002267406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994243,0.0001472272,0.0001390032,0.00002832663,0.00008455134,0.0001765382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004915416,0.0001716627,0.8816274,0.00004731321,0.00006933163,0.0001304504,0.0009846609,0.0002695678,0.1114086,0.0001617005,0.00008955373,0.004548154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005330318,0.00008692224,0.9971315,0.000003963899,0.0000175649,0.00003278146,0.0003705546,0.001270353,0.0009345682,0.0000865241,0.00005546368,0.000004514869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997922,0.000006026654,0.00006624128,0.000003661683,3.131064e-7,0.000001376832,0.000007964513,8.29687e-7,0.0001212768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997603,0.000005123477,0.0001030368,0.000004651651,4.908563e-7,0.000002669976,0.00001458857,6.602599e-7,0.0001085093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008264134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01643205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00659476238506157,"score_gpt":0.1898904183825428,"score_spread":0.1832956559974812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}