{"id":"W2839502115","doi":"10.1142/s238262662050001x","title":"Nash Equilibrium for Risk-Averse Investors in a Market Impact Game with Transient Price Impact","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Market Microstructure and Liquidity","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Uniqueness; Price of stability; Epsilon-equilibrium; Market impact; Best response; Game theory; Transient (computer programming)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004848924,0.0002930689,0.000529822,0.0001846018,0.00007042694,0.00008250946,0.0001971182,0.0001826992,0.0005910938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000936025,0.000251514,0.0001613509,0.0003561378,0.00009135192,0.0002176566,0.00004979542,0.0002402825,0.00001582827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000151227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000911525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007863814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001156331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984484,0.00001210837,0.0004292711,0.0005956159,0.0000421751,0.0004724399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.0001260983,0.0003275546,0.0003520929,0.00004657772,0.0001527774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01246126,0.0006244902,0.8945791,0.001340206,0.000666489,0.00001678723,0.007088697,0.0007564729,0.005568985,0.023844,0.04960987,0.003443661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00269703,0.0008053447,0.9162901,0.00004100448,0.00002731349,0.00003624956,0.00006998085,0.002944034,0.0001068746,0.02901666,0.04731886,0.0006465496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802697,0.0007448728,0.01319221,0.0001477065,0.0001467697,0.0009726312,0.002152646,0.00002762616,0.002345882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981868,0.00008947305,0.0009689012,0.0001609152,0.00009021644,0.00007126466,0.00004132121,0.00003648807,0.0003546382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02171102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0087489851037635,"score_gpt":0.2180275943412382,"score_spread":0.2092786092374747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}