{"id":"W2862524477","doi":"10.1007/s11069-018-3401-1","title":"Flood mapping under uncertainty: a case study in the Canadian prairies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Flooding (psychology); Floodplain; Flood myth; Natural hazard; Probabilistic logic; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Hazard; 100-year flood; Geology; Geography; Statistics; Cartography; Meteorology; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699989,0.0003633719,0.0003325095,0.0008450598,0.002766996,0.001896686,0.001345273,0.001091719,0.0008937989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006821687,0.0002916463,0.0003319118,0.003225875,0.001242914,0.001080013,0.0007981707,0.0007393094,0.00006784131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009162844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008948457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9314005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999326,0.000199969,0.00002574244,0.00009711769,0.0001903804,0.0001608401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971192,0.001821601,0.0002046795,0.0002085735,0.0004910295,0.0001549224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006215994,0.0006108336,0.3469931,0.0002551881,0.0002839498,0.007092186,0.01230598,0.4251315,0.005702534,0.008169984,0.006142267,0.186691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009401519,0.0001804237,0.3744773,0.0001111301,0.00017789,0.001066237,0.02315643,0.5789818,0.002950716,0.006960264,0.01163916,0.0002047202],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905468,0.0001370147,0.004335454,0.0008347028,0.000004791832,0.00005068702,0.0004388121,0.00007730248,0.0035744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910053,0.0001543197,0.007770355,0.00002899001,0.000003673224,0.00001018247,0.0001431604,0.00001981719,0.000864213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06859952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.138007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01846632913661474,"score_gpt":0.2858288396568351,"score_spread":0.2673625105202204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}