{"id":"W2862524477","doi":"10.1007/s11069-018-3401-1","title":"Flood mapping under uncertainty: a case study in the Canadian prairies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Flooding (psychology); Floodplain; Flood myth; Natural hazard; Probabilistic logic; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Hazard; 100-year flood; Geology; Geography; Statistics; Cartography; Meteorology; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005289915,0.000124499,0.00009735192,0.00007421138,0.0004209042,0.0001060102,0.0002914796,0.00004124807,0.0002537681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001778221,0.00008014166,0.00002956516,0.0004315253,0.0001737582,0.0001700884,0.0001350188,0.0002189948,0.0001773447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004067479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005281782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7037681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988027,0.0001057416,0.0001351126,0.0002484568,0.0003597733,0.0003481817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996054,0.00002764171,0.00002991392,0.0002603669,0.000009671075,0.00006698773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005671693,0.0009075815,0.644016,0.00002319646,0.0002100209,0.01018502,0.06432315,0.002773185,0.0001213263,0.003395397,0.08773706,0.1862514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001473571,0.0004797636,0.8238739,0.00001843259,0.00005816977,0.0004057985,0.07562863,0.009638441,0.00001434743,0.001048198,0.08680682,0.0005539099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787433,0.00004204892,0.00001081562,0.003067123,0.0002701813,0.0005792363,0.000001785437,0.00002278411,0.01726274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976914,0.000001402736,0.0001958046,0.001313395,0.0000790452,0.00003375556,0.000002760464,0.000007169775,0.0006752671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2898075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3268082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01846632913661474,"score_gpt":0.2858288396568351,"score_spread":0.2673625105202204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}