{"id":"W2871636454","doi":"10.1520/mpc20170099","title":"An Update on the Impact of Forging Residual Stress in Airframe Component Design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials Performance and Characterization","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Residual stress; Forging; Airframe; Materials science; Structural engineering; Paris' law; Residual; Fracture mechanics; Computer science; Composite material; Crack closure; Engineering; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004005727,0.000751258,0.0005692798,0.001895166,0.0004095587,0.00160989,0.001608356,0.001175137,0.005182697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007772008,0.0006315259,0.0004760383,0.001474535,0.0002956472,0.00185462,0.0006748645,0.001228269,0.002510868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007269107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00130159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003657347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007272954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980016,0.0003659056,0.0002193193,0.0002456201,0.001112701,0.00005481974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913891,0.001833948,0.0003479162,0.000785921,0.005439139,0.0002039338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001118773,0.0002756361,0.002225314,0.0006667702,0.00004794865,0.0001618553,0.0002836747,0.009499744,0.01205819,0.002660468,0.03981768,0.9321909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003483591,0.0005871645,0.005258029,0.00078024,0.0001124713,0.000482719,0.00009834389,0.01583949,0.02104682,0.001715934,0.953953,0.00009085136],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099919,0.164788,0.5468157,0.01233046,0.01634897,0.0008267909,0.003284378,0.01033946,0.1352744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1787356,0.1452835,0.5305517,0.004144531,0.01021331,0.0003317769,0.004586264,0.003227886,0.1229255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005182697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02118456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01380502275555564,"score_gpt":0.2286129912210742,"score_spread":0.2148079684655185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}