{"id":"W2872641930","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12174","title":"The Potential for Cross‐Compliance in Canadian Agricultural Policy: Linking Environmental Goals with Business Risk Management Programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Context (archaeology); Agriculture; Environmental compliance; Incentive; Compliance (psychology); Agricultural policy; Environmental resource management; Public economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Environmental protection","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01603981,0.0004082832,0.0003843833,0.00282738,0.006569964,0.008306822,0.001970665,0.002678535,0.003137133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03853801,0.0003961571,0.0006688065,0.003079432,0.004037347,0.0027487,0.005016276,0.002779777,0.0001097458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09332529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1992215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9495239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9612892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9743901,0.008124202,0.0007326046,0.001141557,0.009128053,0.006483586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617304,0.01288978,0.003526804,0.001492421,0.01678324,0.003577377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002207857,0.0004283305,0.09669001,0.0005747197,0.0002364636,0.0006848574,0.009002852,0.02350171,0.001796139,0.6984327,0.02155147,0.1468799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766212,0.000531756,0.4111019,0.002177531,0.0005942308,0.0002918527,0.03102977,0.05995189,0.005513535,0.1730539,0.3149381,0.0006389957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4012524,0.004550624,0.01735138,0.1092612,0.0002239272,0.0007072599,0.0006242759,0.0001675113,0.4658615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850135,0.0008093838,0.004716254,0.002444962,0.00002806785,0.00008264718,0.00008845826,0.00001189686,0.006804741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09332529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6771256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0167680238092444,"score_gpt":0.1817451647149292,"score_spread":0.1649771409056848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}