{"id":"W2883326882","doi":"10.1097/pr9.0000000000000670","title":"Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PAIN Reports","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Content validity; Critical appraisal; Delphi method; Grading (engineering); Psychology; Construct validity; Content analysis; Medical physics; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Artificial intelligence; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5513451,0.002192654,0.003766224,0.02256236,0.003183555,0.005885494,0.003141765,0.002209724,0.002207451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.759776,0.001500899,0.007735929,0.01362282,0.005190287,0.004601737,0.005250967,0.00253707,0.0008252737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008997364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03287036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001344654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002553796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.322754,0.4031623,0.1848169,0.009051291,0.07799246,0.00222303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1105415,0.5276373,0.09947628,0.03522285,0.2249744,0.002147603],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003413929,0.0008610364,0.05020162,0.1600319,0.00738006,0.0003883232,0.04617691,0.003068108,0.01229165,0.009562133,0.02741657,0.6792079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009210681,0.01265789,0.2193324,0.2766019,0.02842279,0.003078922,0.03166765,0.02868665,0.04613798,0.04314969,0.2974479,0.003605495],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1428095,0.02532855,0.3997597,0.01175595,0.004685514,0.3894311,0.005383824,0.001719181,0.01912676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.148553,0.004781987,0.6178669,0.001815121,0.0005810328,0.2242244,0.001494152,0.000195976,0.0004874102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4486549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5532714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7257407508150466,"score_gpt":0.5468819978429892,"score_spread":0.1788587529720574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}