{"id":"W2883326882","doi":"10.1097/pr9.0000000000000670","title":"Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PAIN Reports","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Content validity; Critical appraisal; Delphi method; Grading (engineering); Psychology; Construct validity; Content analysis; Medical physics; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Artificial intelligence; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5192405,0.0002801192,0.004046216,0.0003095673,0.0001859434,0.0001679828,0.0004068677,0.00008663892,0.0002956294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8082697,0.0001597277,0.001484895,0.001014492,0.0001740188,0.0002841572,0.0001185596,0.00008394207,0.00001025142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004477387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002400731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001348606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9507941,0.01460291,0.0291909,0.001263401,0.003703363,0.0004453239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7051988,0.1514993,0.1040805,0.01010076,0.028663,0.0004575167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002743965,0.0004466636,0.8919355,0.008717984,0.001824521,0.00008665599,0.008067356,0.00005140944,0.01413066,0.002828272,0.03867987,0.03320361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002848451,0.006612417,0.1428348,0.02449646,0.01988851,0.001676879,0.1152442,0.2150014,0.1430462,0.1331695,0.1882275,0.006953756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8199145,0.007186923,0.1697359,0.0003406137,0.0006783616,0.001647347,0.000003558824,0.00002036592,0.0004725248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634525,0.00004075595,0.03594539,0.0001113886,0.0001569911,0.0001237688,0.000006122287,0.00001551571,0.0001475244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7491008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6513505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7257407508150466,"score_gpt":0.5468819978429892,"score_spread":0.1788587529720574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}