{"id":"W2883370322","doi":"10.24357/igjr.4.1.712","title":"Intergenerational Justice in Public Finance: A Canadian case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population ageing; Per capita; Public finance; Economic Justice; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Demographic economics; Economics; Population; Public expenditure; Public economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662748,0.000398609,0.000439871,0.0034648,0.02164978,0.00390225,0.001611272,0.00140957,0.002791004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058819,0.0002771446,0.0006287303,0.0109316,0.003941657,0.001585392,0.003544408,0.002191599,0.0001518547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1374826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959819,0.0006231235,0.00008942682,0.0002331713,0.001085151,0.001987164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953851,0.0009338064,0.0004889602,0.0002697134,0.001843986,0.001078371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002243589,0.0004592553,0.4445238,0.0002616813,0.00008874273,0.0138423,0.3186063,0.001835846,0.0005799875,0.1166944,0.0301685,0.0727148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004048296,0.00009243791,0.3348367,0.000472812,0.00009850367,0.002928263,0.5227462,0.00179222,0.0003493078,0.002576306,0.1339227,0.0001440432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476324,0.001524004,0.0002894171,0.006947528,0.00006075445,0.0001104251,0.0008718554,0.00001066612,0.04255289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915507,0.001750809,0.0005725261,0.000653624,0.00001523491,0.0000353868,0.0002278973,0.000008996501,0.005184811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1374826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4689057363784803,"score_gpt":0.6715684151797056,"score_spread":0.2026626788012252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}