{"id":"W2883393561","doi":"10.1002/smr.1965","title":"Program comprehension through reverse‐engineered sequence diagrams: A systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Software Evolution and Process","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sequence diagram; Program comprehension; Documentation; Reverse engineering; Sequence (biology); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Software engineering; Software; Comprehension; Use Case Diagram; Data science; Information retrieval; Programming language; Data mining; Unified Modeling Language; Software system; Class diagram","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00903588,0.001287688,0.003236722,0.01425178,0.0005268237,0.001850197,0.002446927,0.001380233,0.004020784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04593365,0.0008006861,0.00281817,0.01106824,0.0008316427,0.003867903,0.001442097,0.001099566,0.0005919399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001851035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01216623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004594902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01256264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946826,0.002058821,0.001582629,0.0004630026,0.001101791,0.0001111446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631085,0.02776883,0.003599721,0.0007009329,0.004542264,0.0002797135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009863907,0.00004483424,0.0005554994,0.6612647,0.001621039,0.0001557807,0.0006430376,0.0003229928,0.0004519246,0.001568656,0.005249529,0.3280235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001044902,0.0002662459,0.002708626,0.8029727,0.01187443,0.0007383815,0.0008266792,0.0002649386,0.0007894903,0.00185771,0.1775253,0.00007094227],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006915924,0.9972313,0.0008430897,0.00029009,0.00009073253,0.0001928412,0.0001916923,0.00001881021,0.0004499168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005554074,0.9915951,0.001900361,0.0002573609,0.00003720872,0.0003010165,0.0002017823,0.000009072762,0.0001439136],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01425178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04778689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06289656528401565,"score_gpt":0.3715168890266922,"score_spread":0.3086203237426766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}