{"id":"W2883403996","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1644909","title":"Evaluating the extinction risk of Ligusticum canbyi (Osha): Using the IUCN Red List","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planta Medica International Open","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Museum of Nature; British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Data deficient; Conservation status; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Near-threatened species; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Population; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328682,0.0003286532,0.0002640293,0.002794967,0.0005795048,0.0008047455,0.0004848204,0.0002309669,0.001255569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002082142,0.0000828517,0.0002897509,0.00146455,0.0002689853,0.0006808171,0.0006815721,0.000311409,0.000287435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009609176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004307176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01360628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03418522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994805,0.00009818569,0.0000530904,0.00007919429,0.0002199963,0.0000690309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980817,0.0003703632,0.0009357153,0.00007962258,0.0003496514,0.0001829667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001857494,0.000132022,0.9431628,0.0001774613,0.0001252858,0.0002101096,0.0005227292,0.001583637,0.003877297,0.0002797093,0.001512864,0.04823028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005418594,0.0002886309,0.9909434,0.00005126894,0.00007975516,0.0002807382,0.00102218,0.00302601,0.001193251,0.0003942997,0.002697106,0.0000179311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875998,0.0009111041,0.001915062,0.0001279821,0.00001667026,0.0001306418,0.002320681,0.0000413323,0.006936542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912429,0.0004849901,0.00394407,0.00006254742,0.000008257374,0.00007836935,0.003139814,0.00001047254,0.001028674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01360628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02705419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.126046337160243,"score_gpt":0.3513755087479738,"score_spread":0.2253291715877308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}