{"id":"W2883435672","doi":"10.1177/1468794118788004","title":"Witchcraft and supernatural harm: navigating spiritual ethics in political science research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Harm; Politics; Research ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Work (physics); Spiritual care; Field (mathematics); Bioethics; Epistemology; Political science; Spirituality; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1137686,0.0001183265,0.0001954957,0.0003722157,0.004289296,0.0005035707,0.0007156972,0.0002449969,0.00007534551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137316,0.0001078088,0.00003470073,0.003456972,0.02527522,0.0005038234,0.0005180403,0.003173821,0.0001575233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004401464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1169012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004721828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832445,0.008055842,0.0003530814,0.0006696032,0.00515672,0.002520265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852178,0.009784162,0.00002868046,0.0002265563,0.004035612,0.0007072573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584872,0.00003262847,0.001239723,0.00001723205,0.000003456242,0.000006018906,0.6812497,1.88264e-8,0.0007127086,0.3145163,0.001911804,0.0002945406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002425625,0.0001698177,0.01205757,0.0001462911,5.446826e-7,0.000001097194,0.8278322,0.00002794468,0.0008320106,0.156563,0.001990066,0.0001369568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532829,0.000795981,0.00001932581,0.02843145,0.0001440065,0.0003952989,0.000003962467,0.00002941278,0.01689765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959682,0.0007830864,0.002195357,0.0002494472,0.0004604828,0.00003784169,0.00000162017,0.00001286222,0.0002911053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1579533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4791582883124163,"score_gpt":0.672744616814401,"score_spread":0.1935863285019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}