{"id":"W2883564831","doi":"10.1145/3196398.3196409","title":"A design structure matrix approach for measuring co-change-modularity of software products","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Canada Research Grid; Compute Canada","keywords":"Design structure matrix; Computer science; Modularity (biology); Metric (unit); Software system; Theoretical computer science; Data mining; Software metric; Software; Change impact analysis; Representation (politics); Programming language; Software construction; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951556,0.001077279,0.0004934095,0.007668455,0.0005728806,0.001286536,0.0007780282,0.0009052654,0.002167089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792802,0.0004389694,0.000855557,0.005771736,0.0009566621,0.002291288,0.001213334,0.0009491561,0.0003676484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002108534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002869695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004447123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956399,0.001040561,0.0003461683,0.0005323449,0.002308051,0.0001328803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859201,0.006036045,0.003290516,0.001474098,0.002958979,0.0003203142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000330311,0.0006614576,0.05738265,0.0009507606,0.0006269522,0.0002761234,0.002109607,0.1848608,0.05723765,0.1321781,0.004331077,0.5590546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008278056,0.001052963,0.04613654,0.0001108705,0.0002296869,0.0008054942,0.0007993417,0.8060834,0.02924786,0.09732024,0.01794795,0.0001828695],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0882962,0.000287649,0.9056476,0.0001638843,0.00003305615,0.0003921708,0.0005301554,0.0006148681,0.004034321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4253281,0.0001162321,0.5718797,0.00004549214,0.00001654904,0.0005744566,0.000686982,0.0001004618,0.001252135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007668455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01560956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09623937090276362,"score_gpt":0.3114389159828748,"score_spread":0.2151995450801112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}