{"id":"W2883901182","doi":"10.1089/vbz.2018.2301","title":"Assessing the Repeatability of Tick Dragging as a Method for <i>Ixodes scapularis</i> Surveillance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Ixodes scapularis; Tick; Abundance (ecology); Tick-borne disease; Biology; Lyme disease; Parasitiformes; Acari; Ixodes; Ecology; Veterinary medicine; Ixodidae; Virology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006487073,0.0003154771,0.0005629854,0.00009604874,0.0005722793,0.0001177176,0.0002948069,0.0001479656,0.0003086357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001867113,0.0002314192,0.0002439498,0.0002690828,0.0009422222,0.0002675346,0.0001555004,0.0001514646,0.00004224478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004321987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002424029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005518689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009849021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977277,0.0005588114,0.0004930909,0.0006305767,0.00008281227,0.0005070192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966609,0.001925758,0.0002882438,0.0007142472,0.0003271329,0.0000837121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002116178,0.002704246,0.7381625,0.001393666,0.002748649,0.00001985531,0.001547724,0.00005163727,0.1250738,0.03681396,0.01050074,0.07886709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001752393,0.0007501926,0.9608342,0.000139273,0.000673504,0.00006243756,0.0007667051,0.0002056579,0.02260969,0.004047512,0.007636497,0.0005219348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818782,0.008278666,0.005877228,0.0008965384,0.0007481618,0.0008740731,0.0003291085,0.0002224356,0.0008956353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985249,0.0000394651,0.0005322449,0.0003338074,0.0001911204,0.00009146216,0.00007973312,0.00003823522,0.0001690205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2226717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01530213364050651,"score_gpt":0.3061995965773874,"score_spread":0.2908974629368808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}