{"id":"W2883993395","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-96418-8_35","title":"Identification of Errors in Mathematical Symbolism and Notation: Implications for Software Design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical notation; Computer science; Notation; Correctness; Mathematical software; Software; Usability; Focus (optics); Mathematical structure; Human–computer interaction; Comprehension; Mathematical problem; Mathematical theory; Identification (biology); Language of mathematics; Formalism (music); Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Mathematics education; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116585,0.0007645513,0.0007258741,0.002265119,0.0007128902,0.006576802,0.002222701,0.002194025,0.00749401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1970341,0.0006072058,0.0006062828,0.002240464,0.003367671,0.01281325,0.00354589,0.002871549,0.001234012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000883268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000780347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004825667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903618,0.003499742,0.00134632,0.001182057,0.00330306,0.0003069623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8104741,0.1521555,0.01129098,0.01327462,0.01186326,0.0009415193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007723629,0.0004415743,0.03383165,0.0007031288,0.00006672156,0.0006227529,0.01069863,0.00623736,0.007338753,0.4122543,0.005042365,0.5219904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006432051,0.0001844049,0.01480299,0.0004302269,0.00007241467,0.00140818,0.003612124,0.04151775,0.01675757,0.9104709,0.01058166,0.00009746783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2907388,0.001725095,0.6418751,0.00549601,0.0005087666,0.0001993921,0.000410297,0.001448868,0.0575977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079059,0.0005899522,0.1835252,0.0003241271,0.0001059686,0.0001316222,0.0003256947,0.0003557166,0.006735881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06165677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05579069033554498,"score_gpt":0.3572176100081694,"score_spread":0.3014269196726244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}