{"id":"W2884197231","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.021","title":"International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":463,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia; European Commission; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Benchmarking; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Context (archaeology); Strengths and weaknesses; Tree (set theory); Data mining; Geospatial analysis; Forest inventory; Data science; Forest management; Remote sensing; Geography; Forestry; Mathematics; Cartography; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02501744,0.001613573,0.0009574194,0.01185047,0.001027694,0.003144889,0.002812109,0.001288908,0.002547104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02100634,0.0003377805,0.001842459,0.01214856,0.001100822,0.002849011,0.002925238,0.0009383252,0.001547392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002048187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002009629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006181403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005147143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825117,0.00509489,0.00147652,0.002948842,0.007118118,0.0008500281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849937,0.003262579,0.001060399,0.003512887,0.0064871,0.0006832568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001216495,0.0008204386,0.08594207,0.001641059,0.001163105,0.0001960423,0.001107899,0.1683765,0.0150883,0.02039522,0.01895723,0.6850957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002305259,0.001350871,0.3099469,0.001487212,0.000846147,0.0008919352,0.003580982,0.4780519,0.07314575,0.01743909,0.1126085,0.000420281],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4457874,0.007996499,0.4526985,0.0008482816,0.0006956233,0.001231858,0.01940509,0.005880575,0.06545614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6205566,0.002053377,0.328908,0.0001323033,0.0001184397,0.0006883636,0.04256374,0.001500802,0.00347826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02501744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1323065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03013930919562109,"score_gpt":0.266672765300935,"score_spread":0.2365334561053139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}