{"id":"W2884664204","doi":"10.1108/ijqrm-04-2017-0079","title":"Six sigma for gamma-distributed processes: a case study in oil and gas","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Six Sigma; Sigma; Gamma distribution; Design for Six Sigma; Distribution (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Process capability; Mathematics; Statistics; Process (computing); Quality management; Engineering; Computer science; Operations management; Work in process; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006768213,0.0006346367,0.0005944669,0.001811094,0.001023563,0.001849671,0.00121938,0.001714235,0.001384451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01267093,0.0003104504,0.0008982859,0.001973411,0.001137711,0.0009769994,0.0009666369,0.001186122,0.0002254471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001345962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008510337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006854569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963954,0.001692757,0.0001777351,0.0002807672,0.001194045,0.0002592505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781865,0.01653258,0.001799835,0.0009245613,0.002177008,0.0003794354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001097758,0.001887511,0.117128,0.0009325328,0.0002531181,0.02158755,0.004491193,0.6750104,0.007733265,0.0259032,0.002264836,0.1417106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198359,0.004030152,0.04574295,0.0002831904,0.0002395372,0.005432957,0.007802941,0.8916595,0.01830238,0.01741419,0.008653303,0.0002404715],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514337,0.0006097824,0.04346308,0.0003012895,0.00001934022,0.0002243341,0.00008866187,0.0001060975,0.003753684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987281,0.0002672276,0.01127312,0.00002601795,0.000007628267,0.00004616123,0.000036973,0.00001572748,0.001046177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03579414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1461235668150202,"score_gpt":0.5026393767232397,"score_spread":0.3565158099082194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}