{"id":"W2884730897","doi":"10.1163/15718123-01804002","title":"The Non-combatant Casualty Cut-off Value: Assessment of a Novel Targeting Technique in Operation Inherent Resolve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Combatant; Proportionality (law); Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Statute; War crime; Value (mathematics); International law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01067352,0.0004494058,0.0004387533,0.001747601,0.001033124,0.004550358,0.001674516,0.001743091,0.004606121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03089775,0.0002475364,0.0004505017,0.001265806,0.004936336,0.003927081,0.002548547,0.001971231,0.0006318824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001702613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001939398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007337137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001056647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897927,0.004338206,0.000261128,0.0008146079,0.004332516,0.0004608233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811936,0.01253348,0.002261392,0.001873034,0.001754928,0.000383411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007961834,0.0005808782,0.013983,0.0005364913,0.00009476003,0.000269328,0.003260715,0.004516633,0.01048502,0.5392616,0.003051643,0.4231636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497927,0.01346824,0.07828988,0.002530907,0.0008202048,0.004414355,0.01090371,0.1186895,0.04853425,0.5866715,0.1348242,0.000355329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3897075,0.003424095,0.302502,0.005305427,0.0004571333,0.0009366179,0.000132178,0.0002955329,0.2972396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407994,0.0006473178,0.04947519,0.0004762342,0.0001121559,0.0002731342,0.00003949452,0.00005228552,0.008124728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05644768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05444613609201209,"score_gpt":0.42100518848899,"score_spread":0.3665590523969779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}