{"id":"W2884902003","doi":"10.1177/1049732318785358","title":"Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Compendium; Qualitative research; Critical appraisal; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Management science; Task (project management); Psychology; Systematic review; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Social science; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4633241,0.004244095,0.008609994,0.0344931,0.004187677,0.01703363,0.007516175,0.005310633,0.01155838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6726457,0.00455248,0.007144253,0.03853922,0.009633102,0.01002968,0.01132854,0.01510674,0.009507542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009912168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06338381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003191255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00600254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4043799,0.3429971,0.1921801,0.004821958,0.05390237,0.001718629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1384793,0.660086,0.04513651,0.03075662,0.1225676,0.002974131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001646723,0.0001213227,0.0005681798,0.1545712,0.0009738138,0.0003079349,0.01372424,0.001450073,0.001713895,0.03408772,0.1240504,0.6682667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003432895,0.0001594883,0.001541934,0.2596719,0.000982084,0.0006426822,0.003978239,0.002760163,0.001530954,0.08224846,0.6456485,0.0004922594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001315632,0.1852825,0.5883677,0.0557261,0.02123964,0.1173238,0.004675565,0.003093856,0.02297525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003236025,0.09033035,0.803862,0.002704629,0.002190275,0.09421417,0.0013553,0.0005828965,0.001524418],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5366759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.661817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9946719786802739,"score_gpt":0.9067908936190066,"score_spread":0.08788108506126735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}