{"id":"W2884963234","doi":"10.1080/14634988.2018.1498272","title":"Assessing fish consumption Beneficial Use Impairment at Great Lakes Areas of Concern: Toronto case study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Windsor; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Fish consumption; Remedial action; Fishery; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental health; Ecology; Medicine; Biology; Contamination; Environmental remediation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001539312,0.0003005744,0.0004945064,0.00005157166,0.0004161586,0.00009843111,0.0002636744,0.0000582213,0.002729108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003496371,0.0002772303,0.0000687946,0.0001488766,0.00009487142,0.0007147747,0.0004157792,0.0000641578,0.0004243536],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004184594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000403928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01131197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.292089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965332,0.0004557047,0.0009955324,0.0006113595,0.0007519281,0.0006523459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981055,0.0001296117,0.0006434669,0.0007980751,0.00000587996,0.0003174393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000189774,0.002339775,0.5334028,0.001205284,0.0005890828,0.001763117,0.02123546,0.00008883694,0.0001846379,0.00006986808,0.005319325,0.433612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002866764,0.002174399,0.9669267,0.0004649905,0.0002413471,0.0007045593,0.01859944,0.004931702,0.0001606832,0.00002990058,0.002288054,0.0006114824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952586,0.0001139594,0.0001812874,0.0002335859,0.0005162879,0.002407775,0.00006105514,0.00008769553,0.001139772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987855,0.00007621189,0.0003638163,0.0003238997,0.00008707826,0.00004053626,0.000002408997,0.00003573876,0.0002848008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4335239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05213745284036855,"score_gpt":0.3303691471657734,"score_spread":0.2782316943254048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}