{"id":"W2885050103","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12466","title":"Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":676,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"University of Cambridge; Samsung; British Academy","keywords":"Construct (python library); CLARITY; Design thinking; Identification (biology); Multidisciplinary approach; Polysemy; Management science; Computer science; Principal (computer security); Card sorting; Engineering ethics; Data science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Management; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1622599,0.0026898,0.006162528,0.03287223,0.003588331,0.01808047,0.004589487,0.006558167,0.007711781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2413126,0.002080557,0.004329859,0.0253108,0.009758495,0.02146809,0.009055294,0.008886126,0.001428459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02180309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07793552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005130756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004983222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9147083,0.05649855,0.01227674,0.00389709,0.01069932,0.001919975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.696852,0.2378523,0.01381876,0.01032233,0.03773977,0.003414832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003354119,0.0002491532,0.001760869,0.2107239,0.001065147,0.0004915107,0.01984962,0.002457252,0.0006940315,0.3554935,0.0517822,0.3550975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000238838,0.0003351388,0.001676305,0.4139919,0.001605449,0.0006676728,0.01931897,0.002308564,0.0008052646,0.2450688,0.3137951,0.0001879372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003062685,0.8295411,0.05166357,0.09006837,0.008770018,0.0069791,0.0009828198,0.0001484443,0.008783787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05115067,0.7710055,0.1226733,0.02242017,0.00371662,0.02601151,0.001090905,0.0001391824,0.001792209],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1622599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8581224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1327270948559863,"score_gpt":0.3791089796604313,"score_spread":0.246381884804445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}