{"id":"W2885119136","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.01","title":"<i>Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Supreme court; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Political science; High Court; Sociology; Constitutional court; Common law; Constitution; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653848,0.00008291075,0.0003797808,0.000009228981,0.001012317,0.0003230175,0.0003565149,0.00009781527,0.0002545624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001338412,0.00008547496,0.0001327392,0.0001590196,0.003206459,0.0002616562,0.00003385226,0.0002579104,0.000004357287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003563371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003475253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6814567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986579,0.0002014114,0.0003291821,0.0001262062,0.0001995168,0.0004857441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985748,0.0001778992,0.0002838518,0.0001037166,0.0003464365,0.0005133257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007468629,0.00005286975,0.01335937,0.0001262447,0.0005984361,0.0000678271,0.4846381,0.000002227706,0.00004878548,0.3580678,0.1360881,0.006875608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001932393,0.0002192143,0.006884074,0.0002520016,0.00005641971,0.00006661807,0.06562535,0.000006147432,0.00001268876,0.05599571,0.8686605,0.0002888906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127786,0.001644876,0.000003649234,0.01058005,0.0003619164,0.000200413,0.00007961075,0.000008055334,0.07434279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898846,0.0007579172,0.000121679,0.002830137,0.0004486049,0.000004850463,8.534824e-7,0.000008657258,0.005942699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7325724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0358771769568436,"score_gpt":0.2644654530922324,"score_spread":0.2285882761353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}