{"id":"W2885238424","doi":"10.1371/currents.dis.47581b109e865f7b64d831f86a7fd7f4","title":"An Evaluation of Global Hazard Communication with Ethical Considerations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Currents","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Natural hazard; Service (business); Media coverage; Environmental health; Business; Medicine; Geography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3374901,0.0007817921,0.0009185178,0.008526406,0.004874384,0.01113891,0.002739737,0.003502926,0.008103644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5818961,0.0004676137,0.002227017,0.01019026,0.01684565,0.008953851,0.01141593,0.004448162,0.0006615335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01958761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02113426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002106124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002734205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5344828,0.3263322,0.02783637,0.005582437,0.09970809,0.00605798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1956514,0.600707,0.08647542,0.01616115,0.09263378,0.008371211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001696335,0.002085438,0.4502403,0.009223585,0.0007485057,0.001987564,0.208898,0.001856001,0.0006484619,0.07573804,0.02440039,0.2224773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005342591,0.005761176,0.4336078,0.01048052,0.001083496,0.002335255,0.368001,0.00471677,0.002565166,0.03270489,0.1378882,0.0003214794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752019,0.003488009,0.01499597,0.04424565,0.001274967,0.01601383,0.001682213,0.00009380209,0.1430037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701793,0.0008235653,0.008709664,0.006172921,0.0004055097,0.01158698,0.000255795,0.00004463771,0.001821683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3374901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8169928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09111477916361561,"score_gpt":0.4072096052929632,"score_spread":0.3160948261293476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}