{"id":"W2885333977","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2017-0340","title":"Relationship between background invertebrate drift concentration and flow over natural flow recession and prediction with a drift transport model","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invertebrate; Environmental science; Flow (mathematics); Entrainment (biomusicology); STREAMS; Stochastic drift; Dilution; Ecology; Flow conditions; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Mechanics; Geology; Statistics; Physics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008028399,0.0006098601,0.0003754384,0.0004843061,0.0003431393,0.000646527,0.0003651706,0.0004330045,0.000405907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002080383,0.0003225029,0.0004766774,0.0002257185,0.0002352697,0.0005555144,0.0003876647,0.0004101127,0.0000785937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009155941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001057368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03737684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02271616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998834,0.00003020415,0.000008396347,0.00003882546,0.00001845929,0.00002068309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.000233766,0.000107002,0.00001953678,0.00007365192,0.00003822754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082123,0.00005700354,0.0702048,0.00001076224,0.00004369275,0.00004104504,0.00002453947,0.9230785,0.001087219,0.0004535125,0.0001205217,0.004796304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004213593,0.0000196169,0.004064704,0.000001403487,0.000005698497,0.00000567732,0.000004754751,0.9956965,0.0000787243,0.00008944613,0.00002634775,0.000002910224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754151,0.00005987561,0.02366144,0.00007563315,0.000006786339,0.00001915602,0.0001084852,0.0000801517,0.0005734294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952,0.00005022208,0.004167895,0.000009887721,0.000004568938,0.00001593482,0.000143507,0.000009310444,0.0003985702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03737684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07431859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02174202946138493,"score_gpt":0.2178554474080578,"score_spread":0.1961134179466729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}