{"id":"W2885979138","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.23144","title":"The influence of biological affinity and sex on morphometric parameters of the clavicle in a South African sample","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Human Biology","topic":"Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Discriminant function analysis; Univariate; Clavicle; Linear discriminant analysis; Sexual dimorphism; Population; Multivariate statistics; Sample (material); Biology; Demography; Statistics; Anatomy; Mathematics; Zoology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004574144,0.00009902129,0.0003781089,0.000149504,0.0003090416,0.000003925421,0.0002846463,0.00003881321,0.0000315047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003684887,0.00004444574,0.00007716985,0.0001504528,0.0675201,0.00001980737,0.0001205099,0.0002207979,7.128366e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001139917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002437256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001891373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002846295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998911,0.0003206608,0.0004007436,0.0001096001,0.00006229537,0.0001957117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981191,0.0009560724,0.0006342032,0.0001383371,0.000127455,0.00002488164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004288696,0.0001382373,0.8145187,0.000004886852,0.0002141467,0.000003001315,0.03961372,0.000004590623,0.0004369549,0.1381039,0.0001161623,0.006416847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006513,0.02511219,0.7578292,0.00005761761,0.00006238774,0.00003674993,0.1879192,0.000004513033,0.001951933,0.02315728,0.002619026,0.0002433187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982558,0.0001610233,0.000002102834,0.001190769,0.0001116986,0.00005652285,0.00001842888,0.000002490927,0.0002011719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00009105251,0.00006907041,0.0002582591,0.00006420039,0.000001346897,3.443741e-7,0.000003059311,0.00001288797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1483055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9350176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04295468435462776,"score_gpt":0.2887832414851122,"score_spread":0.2458285571304844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}