{"id":"W2886092291","doi":"10.1108/ijpl-05-2018-0025","title":"Citizen engagement in South Africa: the case Prince Albert","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Leadership","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Community engagement; Public relations; Originality; Value (mathematics); Political science; Construct (python library); Local government; Civic engagement; Unit (ring theory); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Social engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Qualitative research; Psychology; Politics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790356,0.00047111,0.0004198286,0.001191013,0.03058244,0.004147238,0.0009842404,0.004138527,0.00520354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006625842,0.0004863122,0.0003833603,0.002082904,0.0100609,0.00370255,0.00653383,0.00460588,0.0006228705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006766036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03405922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06995244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966183,0.002185943,0.00007520989,0.0001303753,0.0001871648,0.0008030192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968182,0.001519685,0.0003932597,0.0001290407,0.0001620664,0.0009777485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006503228,0.0001437462,0.007505155,0.0003453903,0.00001342388,0.07499142,0.848105,0.0002410196,0.0006239476,0.04500341,0.006105237,0.01685732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001070531,0.00008234211,0.00503329,0.0005015037,0.00001415612,0.01428373,0.84799,0.0002196864,0.0003623938,0.005270013,0.1261997,0.00003240245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089734,0.002765336,0.001027998,0.03355316,0.0001668965,0.0001680506,0.00003275591,0.0000184882,0.05329402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813424,0.002654189,0.0008205667,0.00220437,0.00004906287,0.0001182727,0.00001136545,0.00001665931,0.01278317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03405922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06772196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2139106972401628,"score_gpt":0.3665454350031987,"score_spread":0.152634737763036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}