{"id":"W2886094208","doi":"10.33423/ajm.v18i1.305","title":"Finding Hard Evidences for the Soft Rhetoric of the Stakeholder Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scrutiny; Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder; Shareholder; Profit maximization; Corporate social responsibility; Positive economics; Maximization; Economics; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Business; Public relations; Political science; Management; Corporate governance; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273274,0.0001314946,0.0002156901,0.0001565337,0.0004332793,0.0001140951,0.0007587853,0.000009873293,0.0001861336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001909034,0.0000687819,0.0001505128,0.0007756596,0.0003972884,0.0003428994,0.0003383476,0.00006988133,0.00001674114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002756651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001086604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001669494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001569245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00002460408,0.0003978143,0.0001252694,0.0004730874,0.0001949993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981602,0.000239542,0.001013467,0.0002144929,0.0003648513,0.000007390449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004182877,0.0001786724,0.08154694,0.0004186399,0.002084519,0.000005094524,0.000683773,0.0004941368,0.00004306803,0.4765158,0.155466,0.282145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003898,0.000226679,0.2737968,0.0003595142,0.001399551,0.000002976793,0.01192846,0.0005558621,0.00009930478,0.03175184,0.6785208,0.0003542856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4508658,0.006234691,0.3499304,0.06653212,0.01514873,0.005295022,0.00001408404,0.0001749682,0.1058042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994037,0.0001242458,0.0008145745,0.001984772,0.001390351,0.000009701635,4.405718e-7,0.00001762602,0.001621232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3332478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04401312064545362,"score_gpt":0.2498976750822159,"score_spread":0.2058845544367622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}