{"id":"W2886175935","doi":"10.1002/alr.22194","title":"High tissue eosinophilia as a marker to predict recurrence for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","topic":"Sinusitis and nasal conditions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Eosinophilia; Internal medicine; Chronic rhinosinusitis; Diagnostic odds ratio; Odds ratio; Eosinophilic; Gastroenterology; MEDLINE; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436352,0.002496483,0.0176051,0.006858807,0.0007447078,0.003050812,0.002360104,0.002401492,0.003331341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03524007,0.001398801,0.03799896,0.007180086,0.000840026,0.001637124,0.001399775,0.00179465,0.0002669425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002185907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003234928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007002356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01451115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990773,0.003910739,0.002736287,0.001191566,0.00108347,0.0003050477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673693,0.02539993,0.004389585,0.0007625121,0.001743562,0.0003350701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001754127,0.00002958653,0.01085319,0.3466195,0.6300434,0.0001575316,0.0000900274,0.0005095417,0.0001956768,0.0001002772,0.0005119434,0.009135239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002976976,0.0001230677,0.005116456,0.01691386,0.9763258,0.00009217977,0.00002799525,0.00017555,0.00006549091,0.00009393163,0.0007502844,0.00001756678],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00655457,0.9914961,0.0005521562,0.0002000702,0.0001140206,0.0002494563,0.0006147863,0.00002380094,0.0001950507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2685157,0.7241645,0.002645821,0.001098724,0.000354911,0.001418496,0.001403173,0.00003903103,0.0003594588],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0176051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07596248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03745029742084288,"score_gpt":0.3596399884800742,"score_spread":0.3221896910592313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}