{"id":"W2886195094","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.9771","title":"A REFLECTION ON USING FACE-TO-FACE PEER REVIEW AS A METHOD OF PROVIDING FORMATIVE FEEDBACK","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Experimental Learning in Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Peer feedback; Reflection (computer programming); Face (sociological concept); Peer review; Computer science; Technical peer review; Face-to-face; Medical education; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Course (navigation); Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06656776,0.001508551,0.00066965,0.001264985,0.007922778,0.009574187,0.00382852,0.007099003,0.004623467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2106475,0.0007847022,0.001028354,0.0007925681,0.008925874,0.009073599,0.006427347,0.01797525,0.003931704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006234041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007819673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003643462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004426829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8301984,0.1274821,0.005481595,0.004548977,0.02907793,0.00321099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.724919,0.1353859,0.009499155,0.01843866,0.1027173,0.009040153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003088178,0.0008564098,0.002544738,0.001566577,0.0001062863,0.004532424,0.2766626,0.001179539,0.02570914,0.02499362,0.3971126,0.2644272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000610927,0.0007458759,0.002233382,0.001709845,0.00004002944,0.003463282,0.06120654,0.002473477,0.01089981,0.007501417,0.9093556,0.0003097754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08567332,0.003896192,0.1481809,0.6376783,0.04404316,0.002496341,0.0001866807,0.001573777,0.07627144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5475044,0.007722646,0.1560735,0.1585796,0.01173666,0.002629807,0.0002304609,0.001409702,0.1141133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3520482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03582099343504589,"score_gpt":0.3447020968068822,"score_spread":0.3088811033718363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}